According to @balajis, scalable cooperation beats zero-sum dominance because even top leaders rely on broader systems, so leadership does not scale across contexts while cooperation does, source: @balajis. For equities, focus on firms with measurable cooperation at scale such as rising partner integrations, multi-vendor interoperability certifications, and consistent supply-chain reliability disclosures indicating coordinated execution capacity, source: @balajis. For crypto, screen networks and DAOs with verifiable collaboration metrics including active developer contributors, cross-protocol integrations, bridge and wallet support growth, and governance participation rates to reflect scalable coordination, source: @balajis. De-risk single-leader narratives by assessing succession depth and the strength of community or partner dependency graphs, since overreliance on one alpha is fragile when coordination is required, source: @balajis. Use trade triggers like accelerating integration velocity, expanding co-marketing or ecosystem grants, and rising on-chain participation to identify cooperation flywheels rather than personality-driven momentum, source: @balajis. Avoid setups where dominance posturing substitutes for coordination evidence, and prefer assets with documented collaboration KPIs and transparent roadmaps that support scale, source: @balajis.